Boost your chance of getting published by letting our Master- and PhD-holder subject-expertise editors enhance the language of your manuscript and give your paper a new and professional look at an amazing price.
€15 for 1k
Submit your paper to get insightful comments and corrections on the scientific content of your manuscript made by a PhD-quailed expert with a specialty in your paper’s subject area. We reconstruct your manuscript as the medical journal editors expect to receive them.
Our team will support you at every stage of the publication process by offering you such services as peer review, journal selection, manuscript submission, paper editing, technical editing, and post-submission support.
Our experienced team of statistical analysts would transform your data into a set of clear and well-interpreted results, thereby enhancing the credibility of your research methodology and conclusion
€10 per page
Many scholars are concerned about what will happen to their paper after submitting their manuscript to a journal. To assure these researchers about the quality of their paper, we provide an internal peer review service by PhD-qualified reviewers that are Publon members.
Page and cover design, illustration correction, professional diagrams and shapes, or info-graphic images are the essential parts of every scientific paper. Our graphic design specialists will help you better communicate your findings and fulfill your artwork needs while tailoring to your target journal’s guidelines.
Super Rapid Proofreading
If you have prepared your paper and it is ready for submission, try our super rapid proofreading service to ensure that your manuscript is free of typo errors.
€13 for 1k
Plagiarism and Paraphrase
The plagiarism check service assures you of the originality of your manuscript. Our expert team will inform you about the text overlap and its impact on journal’s final decision in form of a report. In the next stage, you can use our paraphrase service to keep the content but in different words in order and avoid paper retractions.
€25 for 1k
About our Journal package
Our distinguishing attribute is our specialization in Medical Publishing Services
Expertise, quality, accuracy, and punctuality have made us one of the companies preferred by different medical journals.
Serving thousands of authors and dozens of medical journals over years is the backbone of our quality.
95 percent of journals
55 percent of journals
45 percen of journals
99 percent of journals
Why DoNotEdit is growing
Expert Medical English Editors
Artwork, Cover, and Illustration Design
Professional Peer Reviewers
We Collaborate with researchers, Universities, and Journals
DoNotEdit is the preferred partner for many leading universities and research organizations. In addition, we collaborate with researchers and clinicians to promote their research and reports.
You want to be supported for medical publishing and our services
After selecting a journal for the publication of your article, you must read its authors’ guide. In fact, you should write your article within the framework of that journal. Otherwise, the chief editor will reject it. Even if the journal accepts it at first, its reviewing will take a lot more time. If you care about this, it is more probable for your article to get a positive result from the chief editor. Read more about 13 Tips for submitting your manuscript to journals (Part 1)
the abstract of the article is also as important as the title. Sometimes a reader decides whether to read an article or not only based on the abstract. No matter how valuable and relevant a piece of information is, if it is not mentioned in the abstract, it will not attract the reader. Read more about 10 Commandments of Writing an Attractive Paper (Part 2)
In this article, we will provide you with 10 commandments that would help you write a paper that is not only significant from a scientific point of view but also is attractive for the readers. 1 In architecture it is believed that the shape of an object is in accordance with its function. The same Read more about 10 Commandments of Writing an Attractive Paper (Part1)[…]
The methods employed in descriptive research are different from those of field research. So their principles of writing and their structures are different as well. Also, these principles might differ based on the chosen topic. But the general principles of writing descriptive research are the same. Read our article to get familiar with them. Read more about Structure of a Descriptive Research Paper
The general methods and principles governing the reports of scientific research are all based on scientific methods. The American Psychological Association (APA) has provided the authors with a standardized model to facilitate the transfer of research results.
Writing a research paper requires a plan because the structure of an article is as important as its content. Many research papers are written every day, but only a few of them are published in journals. One of the reasons is the researchers’ inability to correctly organize the structure of their article. This structure differs Read more about Structure of a Scientific Article[…]
When you are writing a scholarly article, in addition to what you are trying to say, you should also consider your audience. That is, you should think of what your audience thinks of your article. You need to be aware of your audience’s biases, values, expectations, and knowledge. Besides, you should know your purpose in Read more about Who Is the Audience of a Scientific Journal?[…]
The Role of the Managing Editor
The role of managing editor varies in different journals, however, she/he is responsible for the day to day work of the journal and must report to the chief editor. The managing editor defines the work processes and makes sure that they are followed. Read more about Who Are the Editor in Chief and Managing Editor? (Part 2)
Training reviewers (if possible) could improve the quality of a journal’s reviews and moreover enhance the quality of the submitted article manuscripts. However, members of the editorial board are not qualified to train reviewers, but they can supervise their training and develop brochures or guidelines for this purpose. Read more about Launching Manuscript Management System(Part2)
The editor in chief and managing editor are two completely separate jobs that sometimes have overlapping tasks. These two titles are used interchangeably because the authors and readers of scientific journals and even other types of journals do not know their differences.
Read more about Who Are the Editor in Chief and Managing Editor?
Other types of review are listed below:
- Open Review: This method is used in all medical journals, such as BioMed Central and BMJ.
- Open Peer Review: In this method, all of the submitted articles are published and if the authors can receive favorable opinion from three members of the editorial board, their comments will be published with the article.
The quality of a scientific journal depends on the quality of its content and the reviewers have a critical role in this regard. Journals should not overload their reviewers; furthermore, they should not forget to appreciate the reviewers’ efforts. Besides, the article manuscripts should be initially reviewed before they are sent to the main reviewers. Read more about Launching Manuscript Management System
Article manuscripts may be submitted to the journal through three different methods, namely sending a printed copy, using web-based software, and email. Read more about Responsibilities of a Scientific Journal Office(Part 2)
The success of a scientific journal does not only depend on its scientificity; it also requires precise and accurate management of its publication. One critical issue is managing the manuscripts of submitted or rejected articles. Read more about Responsibilities of a Scientific Journal Office(Part 1)
We can’t expect a scientific journal to become famous without making any efforts; even if it has a high quality. There are some procedures for making a scientific journal known, but before taking action, one should consider one’s resources and the required amount of time. In order to fulfill this aim, only an accurate plan is required, which will not cost much.
Electronic and printed
Journals are often published in both printed and electronic formats. However, the advantages of electronic publishing, such as being inexpensive due to not needing a budget for paper and print, has caused the scientific journals to be published only in electronic format. Electronic publishing can have open access or limited access. Read more about Scientific journal publishing methods
The technological revolution has changed the audiences’ expectations of the scientific journals; therefore, the publishers should consider this matter. The internet has provided scientific journals with many new opportunities and the ability to promote their work. Some of which are listed below: Read more about Different methods of publishing a scientific journal
Precise, commercial, and financial decisions are essential for continuous article publishing in a scientific journal. Moreover, it is of utmost importance to consider financial matters. Moreover, the editor in chief should be clear-sighted about the financial resources which can be attracted (e. g. publishing office or virtual subscribers, advertisements, and gaining sponsorship from associations or institutions). Read more about Finance and Business Planning
Draft Competition There is a competition for drafts when several articles are written on the basis of one study, but two or more authors are involved. The result will be that the authenticity of the study is diminished and the subject of copyright may be lost. When a scientific content has been published in several Read more about Publication Ethics-(Part3)[…]
Deception Deception involves the presentation of untrue findings, alteration of data, or selective reporting of findings. It is very difficult for a journal to identify this fraud at the point of article submission. However, the editorial board and the reviewers must be aware of the possibility of this fraud because this is a very serious Read more about Publication Ethics-(Part 2)[…]
Unfortunately, unethical research practices and dissemination of the research findings are widespread in the scientific community and are observed in many different shapes and forms. The unethical research behavior, such as spreading misinformation about a formula or making significant changes to the rules could have adverse effects on every subsequent study. The important point is that all researchers tend to use scientifically accepted fundamentals Read more about Publication Ethics-(Part 1)[…]
Outlook Gathering the content related to the goals, context of activity, structure, and form of a journal makes the journal long-term outlook clear and the founders know precisely why the content should be published and how it should be presented. Who is responsible for the success or failure of a scientific journal? The answer to Read more about Scientific Journal Strategies[…]
Draft articles are the raw materials of a scientific journal without which, journal will cease publication. Many scientific journals start as quarterly; however, their publication may end in failure due to non submission of sufficient drafts in the absence of a thorough planning. Numerous journals are always out there to publish the draft article. In Read more about Provision of satisfactory conditions for draft article submission[…]
In addition to the purpose and vision of academic journals, it is necessary to consider the type of journals. Scientific journals may be electronic-, print-, or electronic-print-based publications. However, some scientific organizations do not consider the electronic-only form valid. Nonetheless, the majority of universities and research societies recognize the validity of online science journals. In fact, Read more about Types of Scientific Journals[…]
2nd World Congress on Antibiotics scheduled in London, UK during October 16-17, 2019 with the theme Improving World Health with Antibiotics . Antibiotics 2019 conference is organized to unite scientists, researchers, teachers, business delegates, students and research associates to communicate about their experience, knowledge and also about the on-going research.Read more about 2nd World Congress on Antibiotics
1. Read a lot of articles. In order to gain a deep insight into writing and managing the structure of your article, you need to read a large number of articles in your field of interest. It is recommended to look for articles in reliable databases, such as PubMed.
As mentioned in a previous article, a clinical trial is a type of study which investigates the behaviors of a new treatment or intervention on a group of volunteers. Clinical Trial Registration was introduced as a practice to inform the community of researchers about the initiation of a trial. In this regard, the clinical trials registry in the WHO Registry Network was established as a platform for the registration of clinical trials. Read more about Clinical Trial Registration
Journals have different methods of publication for the accepted articles. This article is a short review of different types of publications.Read more about Different types of journal publication
It is important for some scientific journal authorities to know that the authors have observed ethical issues while conducting their biomedical studies on humans and animals. All the submitted articles to a journal should be checked for their observation of ethical standards (consent from the participants and respect participant withdrawal from the study). Therefore, in case the journal needs the proofs of ethics, the authors should provide the necessary documents.Read more about Ethics and publishing
Articles are usually subjected to editing even if they were previously peer-reviewed. In fact, articles are usually edited for a couple of times to eliminate their probable errors. The editing process of a journal highly depends on financial resources. The journals with limited budget usually employ one editor or ask their general editorial board to do the editing. In such cases, a member of an editorial board may voluntarily provide editing services which lead to a high volume of tasks. On the other hand, they might not be highly skillful in editing resulting in obvious mistakes. In this regard, editing services are mainly provided in three different types.Read more about Editing
Citation rate and impact factor are considered as two indicators of journal quality. In traditional approaches, the total number of journal members were suggestive of the importance of a journal. However, this approach was not applicable to open journals since they do not present any hard copy.Read more about Importance of citation rate and impact factor
Digital Object Identifier commonly recognized as DOI is a standard number used for journal articles, research reports and data sets, and official publications to enhance their accessibility. In fact, DOI is a string of numbers that is exclusively assigned to each article. The DOI helps the publishers to enhance the visibility and quality of their journals.Read more about Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
One of the biggest challenges for scientific journals is membership in international indexing databases. Membership of a journal in such databases enhances the visibility, readability, and availability of articles. Indexing databases are usually classified into three groups, as followsRead more about Indexing
The quality of a journal is an important issue, which is highly affected by the budget allocated for the journal. Generally, it is expected that each volume of the journal has a higher quality than the previously published volume. Although having sufficient financial resource is of utmost importance, it is not the only condition for the high quality of a journal. In fact, what counts for the quality of a journal is the right management of an allocated budget.Read more about The content quality of a journal
The review process of an article may take several months to complete. However, when an article is reviewed, the authors are usually required to provide their replies to the comments of the reviewers in less than 2 weeks. In case the authors fail to follow this process, their article would be rejected and it should again be subjected to the review process.Read more about Tips for the post-review process of an article